On January 5, 1981, Sid Klein was installed as Chief of Police, Clearwater, Florida.

In February of 1981, Sgt. Emmons was transferred to the Vice and Intelligence Unit replacing Sgt. Morse. During the month of February, Sgt. Emmons met with Chief Klein on several occasions discussing the current investigations of the Vice and Intelligence Unit. Among the many topics discussed was the Scientology organization. Chief Klein inquired as to the status of the Scientology investigation. I (Sgt. Emmons) explained to Chief Klein, the Clearwater Police Department acted as a clearinghouse for offense reports concerning the Scientology organization. These reports were channeled to the State Attorney's Office for actual investigation. I told Chief Klein this procedure was established through our predecessors, Chief Daniels and Sgt. Morse. I was unaware of the current status of the investigation. I did, however, inform Chief Klein about some Grand Jury proceedings which happened prior to the Chief's current appointment, i.e., the proceedings involving Milt Wolfe, a former Scientology official. Chief Klein gave me several file folders which were housed in the Chief of Police Offices at the Clearwater Police Department. Chief Klein instructed me to start a Clearwater Police Department active file on Scientology and to keep myself and the Chief advised on all the current activities of Scientology. This was the beginning of the active and current investigation into the Scientology organization and its attendant practices.

During most of the year of 1981, I monitored the activities of the Scientology organization along with my other assigned duties as Supervisor in charge of the Vice and Intelligence Unit. The following reports were taken by the Vice and Intelligence Unit involving Scientology. Many other reports were taken by the Patrol Division involving Scientology. These reports are not included in this report due to the nature of the information, (public records incident of a routine nature, i.e., vandalism, harassments, etc.). These reports are not germane to the issues and objectives of this report.

SR3.1 RP-1 Oct. 20. 1981

Private investigators hired by the Scientology organization. This report was taken by Det. J. Kronschnabl and is in reference to private investigators, john Russell of Russell and Associates of Tampa and Mr. Alan Nicola of Nicola Investigations of Lake Wales, Florida. According to the complaintant, a private investigator named John Weigel Detective Agency, Tampa, the above-named agencies were hired by the Scientology organization to do background investigations on Mayor LeCher, Richard, Tenney, Alex Cornell, and Chief Klein.

1982

Jan. 22, 1982. Report Number SR3.1 RW-3, Report by R. Emmons.

This report concerns itself with a woman named Marjorie Wakefield. Ms. Wakefield wanted to cooperate with local officials and give them information about the Scientology organization and her adventures as a Scientologist.

The State Attorney's officials present were skeptical of Ms. Wakefield's motives in coming forward about Scientology information.

During this meeting, I, (Sgt. Emmons) asked Assistant State's Attorney, Paul Meissner, about getting past Clearwater Police Department reports concerning Scientology to place in our files as the police department did not normally keep these reports in the past as they were ~irectly routed to the State Attorney's Office. Mr. Meissner stated he would have to check with his suoerior, James T. Russell, for clearance. At a later date, Mr. Meissner told me I could review any Clearwater Police Department reports housed at State Attorney's Office. This review would consist of taking notes from specific reports relating to specific incidents. I could not copy these reports due to the restrictions of the Public Information Law.

Feb. 10, 1982, Report Number SR3.1 RW-4, a report by R. Emmons.

This report is about vandalism to Marjorie Wakefield's apartment and some general information concerning her departure from Scientology.

May 13, 1982, Report Number SR3.1 RRV-1, a report by R. Emmons.

This report is about a supposed Scientology operative following Ms. Lavinda Van Schaick from Clearwater to Seattle, Washington. Scientology operatives also supposedly attempted to check Ms. Van Schaick's sister, Lisa Rico, out of the University of Washington Mental Health Center. The Seattle Police Department, a Sgt. D.J. Oliver, was contacted by Sgt. Emmons for assistance.

Report and Memo Number SR3.1 MH-2

These reports and memos are about underage children working at the Scientology Headquarters and other health and safety violations.

The first half of this report is an interview conducted by Sgt. R. Emmons with Building and Fire Officials of the City of Clearwater.

The Fire Officials and Building Inspectors observed many children working in the chase ways at the Ft. Harrison.

An administrative search warrant was conducted on the Ft. Harrison of the 28th of June, 1982. Violations of building codes and fire hazards were cited. The Scientology organization was given time to correct these code violation, which according to Building and Fire Officials, they ultimately complied with.

July 12, 1982. Report and Memo Number, SR3.1 MH2c

This report is a summary of the effort by the City of Clearwater and its officials to enforce health, safety, and public housing ordinances and state statutes.

The report also details meetings with Dr. Wella Brown, Director of the Pinellas County Health Department, and her Legal Assistant, Helen Hobbs.

July 1, 1982, Report Number SR3.1 MH2b

This is a report by R. Emmons reference suspected Child Labor Laws violations by the Scientology organization. The permission letter to the State Attorney's Office from the Department of Labor, State of Florida, to investigate Child Labor Law violations.

Nov. 1, 1982, Report Number SR3.1 RN-1, by L.R. White concerning interview with two Scientologists (R. Emmons present)

Two Scientologists, Linda Ann Nix and Lilli Katechis, report housing and living conditions within the Scientology organization. They further report false promises and false statements made to them to come to Clearwater, Fla. Both subjects just wanted to leave Scientology and return home to California without problems.

Dec. 20, 1982, Report Number SR3.1 RI-4, by Lt. Richard White.

This report is concerning unusual phone calls and other occurrences to Constance ILiSby) Phillips, fiance of City Commissioner, James Calderbank.

1983

Feb. 24, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RV-2, XO Treasure Island P.D. Report 830942.

This report is concerning Linda Van Schaick's dog being placed in the trunk of her car.

Mar. 21, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 R (S-lb), investigative summary.

On the 21st of March, 1983, this investigator was assigned to a "Task Force" composing of members from the State Attorney's Office, the Florida Dept, of Law Enforcement, the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and the Clearwater Police Dept. This task force was ultimately dissolved in Oct. of 1983.

During my tenure, (Lt. Emmons), on this task force, I was assigned to collating and interpreting Scientology documents, in addition to other assigned tasks.

Mar. 21-25, 1983, Report Numbers SR3.1 RT A-1, SR3.1 RT A-2, SR3.1 RT A-8.

During the first week of my (Lt. Emmons) assignment to the State Attorney's Office investigating Scientology, I was assigned to draft questions that were to be used in the Jocelyn and Jerry Armstrong interview process. These interviews yielded a great deal of information concerning financial transactions and fraudulent practices.

In Marie King's synopsis of the G. Armstrong testimony, page 3 is a statement of facts. Ms. King states these are facts of fraud and extortion.

To date, Jan. 14, 1985, these facts as stated by Ms. King have not been acted upon.

May 1983, Report NumSer SR3.1 R (J-1)

This report is a summary of purposed investigative techniques which could be employed to monitor the activities of the Scientology organization. This report was composed by Lt. Emmons.

During the assignment, two witnesses were brought to Clearwater for testimony, Jocelyn and Jerry Armstrong. These witnesses testified to a great many financial transactions in addition to other Scientology practices which appear to be fraudulent.

An attempt was made by this writer to have the State Attorney's Office file a formal motion to retrieve various incriminating documents in the Church of Scientology vs. Gerald Armstrong Case in Los Angeles. The State Attorney's Office did not agree with this writer's, Lt. Emmons, assessment of how to obtain these beforementioned documents from the L.A. Court System via the motion process and the matter was dropped.

Also during this timeframe, discussions were held with James Barton, Assistant to the Attorney General of the State of Florida, reference the Florida R.I.C.O. Statutes. Mr. Barton was very reluctant to pursue R.I.C.O. violations involving the Scientology organization because of prosecution jurisdictional problems and First Amendment considerations.

A meeting was conducted with Federal Prosecuting Attorney, John Fitzgibbons, and F.B.I., George Kraut and this writer, (Lt. Emmons). At this meeting, the Federal people were presented with documents and other materials involving Scientology. Mr. Fitzgibbons and Agent Kraut stated they would examine the documents and schedule another meeting to discuss Federal involvement, Prosecutor Fitzgibbons was extremely critical of the lack of man-power devoted to the current investigation conducted by Mr. Russell's office. He took particular notice of the fact that a lawyer was not assigned on a full-time basis. He commented that an investigation of this scope should have at least two lawyers and two accountants assigned along with at least six investigators.

On the 29th of Sept. 1983, this writer, (Lt. Emmons), and City Attorney, Thomas Bustin, met with Attorney Fitzgibbons and Agent Kraut of the F.B.I.

It was explained to the Federal authorities the problems local law enforcement had in investigating the Scientology organization, i.e., financial money flows crossing state lines into foreign banks, the inability of local law enforcement to subpoena out-of-state witnesses to local Grand Juries and the complexity of the Scientology organization itself. Mr. Fitzgibbons told Mr. Bustin and myself he would author a memo to his superior, U.S. Attorney Robert Merkle, to be forwarded on to Washington, D.C. Mr. Fitzgibbons was not too hopeful the Justice Dept. would give its sanctions to investigate the Scientology organization. As of this date, Jan. 14, 1985, the Clearwater Police Dept., nor the City of Clearwater has received a reply from the Federal authorities upon our request for Federal involvement into the Scientology organization which was formally made on Sept. 29, 1983.

On Oct. 17, 1983, I, (Lt. Emmons), was informed by Chief Investigator, Robert Somers of the Pinellas/Pasco State Attorney's Office, he was going to ask his superior, Janes T. Russell, to terminate the task force investigation. I relayed this information to Chief Klein and my task force assignment was concluded. I was reassigned to the Clearwater Police Dept. to continue the Scientology investigation.

In addition to the foregoing investigative efforts mentioned during the timeframes of Mar. 21, 1983 and Oct. 17, 1983, I, (Lt. Emmons), was also involved in other reports and cases while assigned to the before-mentioned task force.

During the first few months, my (Lt. Emmons) role assignment was to decode and explain Scientology policies and procedures. I, however, expanded that role to include contacting many ex-Scientologists about current information concerning the organization. Many of these sources kept me informed on a daily basis of various Scientology activities. Most of these activities mentioned were not of themselves criminal in nature; however, through these sources, I was able to establish familiar patterns of operation/management philosophies. These patterns were extremely useful in explaining how Scientology works and why the Scientologists employed some of their tactics in a manner which would seem abnormal or deviant to the casual observer.

May 16, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 R S-9.

Interviewed a Martin Samuels in reference to a Mission Holder's responsibilities and his personal problems with the Scientology organization. Mr. Samuels is currently involved in civil litigation against the Scientology organization. Mr. Ssmuels contends he was unfairly dismissed from his posts as Mission Director for three missions in the San Francisco area.

May 16, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RA-10

At the inception of the Scientology investigation task force operations, it became apparent if the investigators could obtain the documents contained in the Los Angeles Superior Court, the Church of Scientology vs. Gerald Armstrong Case, much of the evidence to prove fraudulent practices would be in hand. I, (Lt. Emmons), informed the Assistant State Attorney assigned to this task force, Marie King, if she could explore the possibilities of obtaining the documents through a court motion. Ms. King communicated with a Los Angeles lawyer, Julia Dragojevic, concerning a court motion.

Ms. King wrote this memo, SR3.1 RA-10, explaining the need for a Grand Jury proceeding underway in order to obtain the documents in the Armstrong Case. Ms. King's interpretation of Judge Cole's documents ruling.

June, 1983, Report Number

the Faith Huxley Case.

Attorney Michael Flynn contacted me, (Lt. Emmons), concerning a Ms. Faith Huxley and an alleged fraudulent appropiation of $325,000 of Ms. Huxley's funds by members of the Scientology organization. After a series of telephone calls, Ms. Huxley agreed to come to Florida and testify about her transactions with representatives of the Scientology organization. On the day Ms. Huxley was supposed to arrive in Florida, she settled with the Scientology organization. The matter was dropped for the present.

June 6, 1983, Report Mumber SR3.1 RD-1, XO 83-06-1095-Investigator Ed Walter.

This is a report concerning a grand theft for the safe at Scientology Headquarters. A subject named Debbie DeRosa was charged with grand theft. On Aug. 3, 1983, Ms. DeRosa was interviewed by Lt. Ray Emmons and Agent Steve Vangura of the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement. The conversation centered around Ms. DeRosa's personal knowledge of Scientology policies, practices and procedures.

June 27, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RS-11.

This is a report by Ms. King in reference to a visit by Congressman Bilirakis' aides, Sandra Hanburg and Steve Van Slyke. Ms. Hanburg and Mr. Van Slyke informed Ms. King they were in the area gathering information concerning Scientology's infiltration into businesses in the Clearwater community. Ms. Hanburg told Ms. King that Congressman Bilirakis' Committee on Small Businesses intended to hold hearing in the Clearwater area in late 1983 about Scientology. Ms. Hanburg was supposed to meet with Chief Klein about the situation; however, she never did. Small business congressional hearings were held in Clearwater in 1983.

I, (Lt. Emmons), came upon this report, (SR3.1 RS-1) after the hearings were held.

Sept. 21, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RZ-2.

This is a report from John Zeigel and Lloyd Greenberg concerning various financial flows and other activities of the Scientology organization.

Sept. 21, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 R (A-10)

On Sept. 21, 1983, I, (Lt. Emmons), called julie Dragojevic, Attorney at Law, concerning the documents in the Armstrong Case. Ms. Dragojevic stated she did not believe the Judge would require the investigative steps to be inclusive as to impanel a Grand Jury as long as Mr. Armstrong's statement had been taken. Mr. Armstrong testified at the Pinellas/Pasco State Attorney's Office in Mar. 1983.

I relayed this message on to Ms. King with no response.

Sept. 26, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RC-1.

This report concerns other agencies in California having information on Scientology.

I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted several agencies in California concerning any information about Scientology - Oct. 5, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RU-1.

On the 29th of Sept., 1983, City Attorney, Thomas Bustin, and I, (Lt. Emmons), traveled to Tampa and spoke with U.S. Assistant Attorney, John Fitzgibbons and F.B.I., George Kraut.

The scope of alleged criminal activity pertaining to suspected fraudulent practices and other suspected crimes designed to insulate the fraudulent practices from detection were explained to Mr. Fitzgibbons. Mr. Fitzgibbons was asked if the Federal Government could aid the Clearwater Police Dept. in the investigation of Scientology. Mr. Fitzgibbons stated he would author a memo to his superior, U.S. Attorney Robert Merkle, concerning our visit. Mr. Fitzgibbons was very doubtful the Justice Dept. would give approval for this type of investigation. Mr. Fitzgibbons told us he would get back to us (Lt, Emmons and Mr. Bustin), with an answer to Federal involvement. Once again, this meeting took place on Oct. 5, 1983. At the time of this report, the chronological summary, the City of Clearwater has still not received a reply from the U.S. Attorney's Office.

Oct. 5, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RS-12.

This report is ahout the Scientology organization filing an injunction against City Officials in an attempt to stop enforcement of the Charitable Solicitation Ordinance.

Oct. 6, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 R (S-13)

This report concerns contact made by Mr. David Jordan, Attorney at Law, in the Los Angeles area. Mr. Jordan was calling in reference to collecting refunds for some of his clients. While inquiring about these procedures, Mr. Jordan informed me he has made contact with various prosecution agencies in the State of California about Scientology's practice of keeping their adherents' monies that are paid in advance. These agencies told him he has a civil problem and not criminal in nature.

Nov. 16, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 MC4.

This memo outlines the administrative procedures on how to handle requests for refunds and repayments in connection with the City of Clearwater's Charitable Solicitation Ordinance.

Since the inception of the Charitable Solicitation Ordinance, I, (Lt. Emmons), have received countless phone calls and letters from virtually every "free" world country regarding refunds, repayments and the Charitable Solicitation Ordinance. I have sent letters to these complaintants explaining the Charitable Solicitation Ordinance, namely the prohibited acts therein. I, (Lt. Emmons), have helped these complaintants route their paperwork to the appropriate source.

Dec. 2, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RO-6.

This report pertains to the Scientology files seized in the search warrant execution at the Toronto Org of Scientology in March, 1983. Const. Burley advises these files will probably be opened to the public during a hearing in March, 1984. Burley wanted the Clearwater Police Dept. to be aware of this occurrence in case we had an interest in looking at these files as it will later reported. The files were not available in March. In June of 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), traveled to Toronto and examined some Scientology files.

Dec. 20, 1983, Report Number SR3.1 RA5b

This report is concerning conversations with police officials of the Australian Government, Los Angeles Consulate General Office. Mr. Millwird was inquiring about the Scientology organization and its practices. After a conversation concerning some Scientology activities, I, (Lt. Emmons), advised Mr. Millwird on what documents to obtain and where to get them. Most of these documents mentioned are public policies of the Scientology organization.

1984

Jan. 2, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RW-2, XO 84-0125.

This report is about a subject named Willie Wilson who was detained by members of Scientology at the Ft. Harrison Hotel. Mr. Wilson later denied he was forcefully held against his will.

I, (Lt. Fmmons), interviewed the cab driver in this incident, Gary Vinyard, who confirmed the police officer's original report. Mr. Vinyeard sued the Scientology organization for damages because he was detained against his will. The Seientology organization settled this suit immediately and out of court.

Dec. 20, 1983 through Jan. 24, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RK-2.

During the timeframe of Dec. 20, 1983 through Jan. 24, 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), was contacted many times by Attorney Michael Flynn regarding a possible extortion attempt against Federal Judge Ben Krentzman, United States District Court, Tampa, Fla. Mr. Flynn told me (Lt. Emmons), the covert operation against Judge Krentzman was approved at the highest level of the Scientology organization. The money for this operation was allocated from Scientology funds. This covert operation also centered itself on local businessmen. The local businessmen in question had been taken aboard a yacht disguised as a businessmen's meeting.

I, (Lt. Emmons), made contact with Federal and State authorities asking permission to investigate the incident involving the local Clearwater businessmen.

The Federal authorities, (Attorney Fitzgibbons and F.B.I. Agent Kraut), did not want local authorities to investigate the case at this time.

In conversations with Agent Kraut of the F.B.I., he told me (Lt. Emmons) the F.B.I. was just going to investigate the incident with the Federal Judge Krentzman, and local Clearwater businessmen and not the practices of the Scientology organization.

After several weeks, Agent Kraut contacted me, (Lt. Emmons), again and stated he was now going to begin the boat incident investigation. Agent Kraut had been tied up on other matters.

After several more weeks, I, (Lt. Emmons), learned through a confidential source the only persons the F.B.I. had talked to was Judge Krentzman, who denied going aboard the yacht and a local Clearwater businessman who drove to Tampa volunteered information.

I called Agent Kraut inquiring about the status of the case. Agent Kraut told me he had interviewed Judge Krentzman and a local Clearwater businessmen and as far as he was concerned, the case was closed.

On Jan. 23, 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), received two articles from Attorney Flynn. The first article was from "The American Lawyer" magazine and is entitled, "Scientology's War Against Judges" The second article is a newsletter which outlines the Scientology role in the attempt to compromise Judge Krentzman. I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted U.S. Attorney John Fitzgibbons and told him the content of these articles. Mr. Fitzgibbons asked for copies of these articles which I sent.

Jan. 13, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 FK-1.

A subject named Johann Kempff complained the Scientology organization owed him around $50,000 in advanced fees. Mr. Kempff further alleged violations of the Charitable Solicitation Ordinance had occurred. Kempff told me, (Lt. Emmons), the Scientology organization had transferred $5,200 of his money into his girlfriend's standing account without his knowledge beforehand. When Mr. Kempff called the Scientology organization about his accounts, he was told his money had been transferred. Mr. Kempff then gave approval for the money transfer. Mr. Kempff informed the

Scientology representative, James Grant, he was sending $10,000 to be placed in his advanced fees accounts, not his girlfriend's. When Mr. Kempff arrived at Scientology Headquarters in Clearwater, he found out his $10,000 had been placed into his girlfriend's account. Mr. Kempff was expelled from Scientology.

For several weeks, I kept in contact with Mr. KemFff in case he wanted to pursue the matter of his missing $10,300. Mr. Kempff was attempting to collect the fees and refunds owed to him by working with Scientology officials.

When Mr. Kempff finally decided on his own he couldn't collect his money from Scientology, he recontacted me (Lt. Emmons). Mr. Kempff filled out an affidavit that alleged violations of the Charitable Solicitation Ordinance. In addition to violations of the CIty Ordinance, Mr. Kempff felt Mr. Grant of the Scientology organization had taken his $10,000 and placed it into his girlfriend's accounts without his permission. I instructed Mr. Kempff to get a singed affidavit from his girlfriend, Monica Neilsson, who was in Sweden, concerning her involvement in the $10,000 transfer.

Mr. Kempff complied with my request and a few days later returned to the Police Dept. with a notarized signed affidavit from Monica Neilsson. The affidavit stated Ms. Neilsson did not know about the second transfer of funds for $10,000 into her account. She was told to continue taking courses as she had unused monies in her accounts. When she felt she had definitely used up more courses then her money in her accounts, she was finally told that Mr. Kempff had been expelled from the Scientology organization, so she might as well use up Mr. Kempff's advanced fees monies. Monica was under the impression Mr. Kempff had given approval to use his money.

Mr. KemFff wanted to prosecute Mr. Grant and another Scientology official for theft of his money.

I, (Lt. Emmons), made several appointments with Mr. Kenpff trying to set up a State Attorney's investigation for theft. Mr. Kempff would fail to show at the appointed times. Mr. Kempff would show up at the Police Dept. a day or two later forgetting the actual appointment times. Finally Mr. Kempff went home to Sweden without pursuing legal charges.

Jan. 24, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (R-5)

This report concerns realtor, Al Rogers, buying property for the Scientology organization. Most of the property transactions occur in the Clearwater area.

Jan. 26, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RU-2

On the 26th of Jan., I, (Lt. Emmons), was sent a copy of a court ruling decided in the Eighth Circuit of the Federal Courts, St. Louis, MO. The thrust of this case involved religious institutions employing volunteer workers in capacities other than religious practices.

I contacted Mr. Garringer of the U.S. Wage and Hour Commission. I explained to Mr. Garringer how Scientology uses their employees in various capacities other than religious pursuits. Mr. Garrincrer told me this court ruling in question did not apply to the Scientology organization. The court ruling in question, Donovan vs. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation. In this particular case, church members were working totally outside the church in a for profit corporation run 5y the same church. In Scientology, all the corporations are on a not for profit basis and fall under the umbrella of the Church of Scientnlogy of California; therefore, the ruling does not apply.

Dec. 23, 1983 through Jan. 26, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT (S-5)

Attorney Michael Flynn made contact with me, (Lt. Ray Emmons), concerning possible testimony of former Scientologists, Laurel Sullivan and William Franks. Mr. Flynn told me Ms. Sullivan had a great deal of testimony about financial transactions and Scientology corporation structures.

I contacted Marie King of the Pinellas State Attorney's Office reference Ms. Sullivan and Mr. Franks' testimonies. Ms. King advised me to recontact Mr. Flynn and have him draw up a proffer of probable testimony of Sullivan's and send it to me. I contacted Mr. Flvnn and relayed Ms. King's request of a Sullivan proffer.

Mr. Flynn sent me a proffer of probable testimony, (Sullivan's), on Jan. 26, 1984. I reviewed the proffer and found it to be extremely important testimony regarding the total financial, fraudulent overview of the Scientology organization. Ms. Sullivan was the top Public Relations Representative in Scientology and worked directly for L. Ron Hubbard for many years. I gave Ms. King a copy of the proffer for her review. I told Ms. King of the extreme importance of Sullivan's testimony. Ms. King told me she would have to check with Mr. Russell to determine if he was going to offer immunity to Ms. Sullivan in lieu of her corporation with law enforcement.

Several days had passed and I asked Ms. King if Mr. Russell had reached a decision on immunity for Ms. Sullivan. Ms. King told me she had not talked to Mr. Russell as both of them were extremely busy. I told Ms. King, I, (Lt. Emmons), would like a determination on the immunity question as soon as possible.

After several more days, I reccntazted Ms. King and told her Ms. Sullivan's lawyer, Michael Flynn, was getting impatient for an answer to the immunity problem. Ms. King told me she didn't know if the State Attorney's should give Ms. Sullivan immunity as she had apparently participated in some activities that could be criminal in nature. I reminded Ms. King we would not have any knowledge of the activities Ms. Sullivan mentioned if she had not come forward with the imformation. Ms. King told me she was unsure whether the State Attorney, James Russell, would give Ms. Sullivan immunity.

I, (Lt. Emmons), then contacted the Ontario Provincial Police, Det. Sgt. Al Campini, and accountant, Joe Zier. I informed them Ms. Sullivan is willing to testify provided she receive a contract of immunity. Sgt. Campini told me he would check on the situation with the Crown Attorney. The next morning, Sgt. Campini contacted me and stated he wanted to come to Florida and interview Ms. Sullivan. The Crown Attorney had agreed to a contract of immunity for Ms. Sullivan.

Arrangements were made for Det. Sgt. Campini, Accountant Joe Zier, and Inspector John Germaine of the O.P.P. to interview Ms. Sullivan.

I informed Ms. King that Ms. Sullivan would be in Clearwater on the 25th of Feb., 1984, if she wanted to take part in the interview. I further informed Ms. King that Ms. Sullivan would have to be immunized from prosecution if the State Attorney's Office were involved.

Ms. King and Howard Jiehle, investigator for the State Attorney, sat through the interviews.

Jan. 29, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (M-4)

This report is concerning John and Erna Martinique's experiences with the Scientology organization. Mr. and Mrs. Martinique stayed in the Scientology organization for about a week, in Jan. 1984. They explained how the indoctrinated processes into Scientology took place, namely the showing of a film to new members that depicts L. Ron Hubbard as a Doctor of Philosophy and a learned man. They were given a book entitled, "Scientology - A New Slant on Life" This book proclaims Hubbard to be a World War II hero and he was crippled and blinded. During the war, he cured himself with the development of Dianetics.

The Martiniques also testified to many other Scientology practices and procedures.

Jan. 30, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (P-ld)

This is a report concerning some background information on private investigator, Eugene Ingram.

Jan. 31, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (K-2)

This is a follow-up report on background information pertaining to private investigator, Fred Kane. Mr. Kane works for Richard Bast, the private investigator involved in the Judge Krentzman affair.

Feb. 1, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RK-2

The affidavit of Richard Bast and the declaration of Robert S. Keefer.

This affidavit and declaration were filed in Federal Court reference the Tonja Burden Case. The affidavit and declaration were filed to explain Mr. Bast's role in the Judge Krentzman boat incident.

Feb. 1, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (K-2)

The report concerns the boat incident and Krentzman incident. I, (Lt.Emmons), made contact with Federal and State authorities asking permission to investigate the case.

This case was outlined previously in this summary.

Feb. 2, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (S-5)

This is a follow-up report concerning Laurel Sullivan's testimony.

I contacted Federal Prosecutor, John Fitzgibbons, in regards to Ms. Sullivan's upcoming testimony. Mr. Fitzgibbon's wanted to be informed if Ms. Sullivan had any testimony about the Judge Krentzman situation or any other situation Scientology might have been involved in concerning Federal judges.

Feb. 3, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT S-5

The report is about a meeting among Agent Steve VanGura, Lt. Emmons, and Agent Larry Sprinkle of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service discussing Laurel Sullivan's alien/immigration status.

Feb. 3, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RP-1E

This report is about a Scientology document left in a public place.

A confidential source gave me, (Lt. Emmons), a Scientology document which was left in the phone booth near the downtown Maas Brothers store.

This document indicates persons unknown apparently conducted a brief background information report on some prominent Clearwater community leaders. The documents indicate whether these prominent persons are friendly or unfriendly toward Scientology.

Feb. 3, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT S-5H

This report concerns the conversation with Marie King regarding Laurel Sullivan coming to Florida to testify. The content of this report was covered earlier in this summary.

Feb. 6, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (0-2a)

This report is concerning some information from the Ontario Provincial Police - Const. Bruce Burley. Const. Bruce Burley stated lawyers for Mary Sue Hubbard wanted to plea bargain his client. Also Const. Burley had documents to prove Hubbard is not a Doctor of Philosophy. Const. Burley agreed to send these documents to me, (Lt. Emmons)

Feb. 7, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT S-5G

This report concerns a conversation between Laurel Sullivan and myself, (Lt. Emmons), reference Ms. Sullivan's immigration status.

Feb. 7, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RA (5a)

This report concerns information from the Australian ConsulateGeneral, Los Angeles, Inspector Peter Lamb, about high Australian Scientology officials coming to Clearwater.

Feb. 8, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RI-8a

This report concerns information from Special I.R.S. Prosecutor, Martin Cohen. Mr. Cohen informed me, (Lt. Ray Emmons), a law clerk working on the Scientology case was murdered in a parking garage in Washington, D.C. After making contact with the appropriate officials, I, (Lt. Emmons), was informed the law clerk in question, a Mr. Gluckman, was a victim of a homosexual robbery/murder. The police officers working the case assured me the murder was not connected to the Scientology organization.

Feb. 8, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R(K2a)

This report concerns a conversation between Agent Kraut and myself, (Lt. Emmons), reference the Krentzman boat incident. The report also addresses conversations between Lt. Emmons and A.U.S.A. John Fitzgibbons, Lt. Emmons and Scott Hopkins, S.A.O., Lt. Emmons and Chief Investigator, Robert Somers, S.A.O.

In the first part of this report, Agent Kraut explains he has not begun to investigate the Krentzman boat incident due to other priority items, i.e., a school in Quantico~ Va., Carnie Investigations, Florida State Fair and in-house political problems.

I, (Lt. Emmons), next contacted Mr. Fitzgibbons of the U.S. Attorney's Office. Mr. Fitzgibbons told me Mr. Merkle, the U.S. Attorney, was personally handling the Krentzman/boat incident.

Mr. Fitzgibbons also told me Mr. Merkle had conversations with Mr. Russell, the Pinellas States' Attorney, about the boat incident. I, (Lt. Emmons), then contacted Scott Hopkins, an investigator for the Pinellas States' Attorneys Office.

Mr. Hopkins told me he would check with Robert Somers, the Chief Investigator of the Pinellas States' Attorneys Office, to see if we, local officials, were going to investigate possible state statute violations.

I informed Mr. Hopkins of various investigative leads I had come across since the boat incident had made the ~ewspapers. ApFroximately an hour later, I, (Lt. Emmons), received a telephone call from Mr. Somers. The exact conversation as recalled at the time of the incident is as follows:

Mr. Somers: How's it going?

Lt. Emmons: Alright.

Mr. Somers: Look, on this boat incident, Mr. Merkle's Office is going to investigate it.

Lt. Emmons: I didn't want to cause any flap between agencies. I just wanted to know if the Fed's are investigating the incident and if not, can we, as state crimes might have been committed?

Mr. Somers: Mr. Merkle is going to investigate the case. You'd better be careful with Merkle, he'll put your ass in jail for
obstructing justice.

Lt. Emmons: O.K., thank you for the information.

The conversation was terminated.

Feb. 9, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (K2F)

This report is a letter from a supposedly German investor regarding the investments of property in the Clearwater area by German businessmen.

I, (Lt. Emmons), believe this letter to Sam Casella, a member of the Clearwater Downtown Development Board, was the instrument used to set up the phony meetings between private detectives in the employ of the Scientology organization and Clearwater businessmen.

Since I was under advice not to interfere with the investigation of the boat incident and since the F.B.I. had not acted upon any of the information I had thus far given them, I did not inform Federal agents of this letter.

Feb. 9, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT (S5I)

This report concerns the development of other high-ranking ex-Scientologists as potential witnesses.

Later on in this surmmary, it will be explained how the development of witnesses took place. Also explained later on is the procedure worked out among Lt. Emmons of the Clearwater Police Department and the various lawyers representing the ex-Scientologists to make them available for testimony for Canadian officials.

Feb. 9, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT (S5J)

This report concerns the availability of Homer Schomer to testify for law enforcement officials. I, (Lt. Emmons), later arranged to have Schomer meet Canadian officials for the purpose of testimony.

Feb. 13, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT (S5H)

This report is concerning two conversations with Assistant States' Attorney reference immunity for Laurel Sullivan. The substance of this report was elaborated on in a prior section of this summary.

Feb. 15, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RT (S5K)

This report concerns conversations between Lt. Emmons of the Clearwater Police Department and Assistant States' Attorney reference Laurel Sullivan's immunity and probable testimony. In this report, I, (Lt. Emmons), notified Ms. King that Laurel Sullivan was coming to Clearwater to testify before Canadian police officials and myself. Ms. King informed me, (Lt. Emmons), in all probability I would not be allowed to enter the room when Sullivan was testifying because Sullivan did not have immunity. Ms. King stated the States' Attorney, James Russell, would not be rushed into making a decision on the immunity question despite the fact the Canadians have given Sullivan immunity. Mr. Russell's general over-all posture, according to Ms. King, was simply turn Ms. Sullivan over to the Canadians without local law enforcement/prosecution involvement.

This report is also about the attempts of Lt. Emmons to notify Mr. Fitzgibbons of the U.S. Attorney's Office concerning Laurel Sullivan's testimony.

Feb. 20, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (S-1D)

This summary is an accounting of various investigative steps taken by Lt. Emmons for the years 1983-1984. This report was completed in preparation for meetings with congressional representatives in March 1984.

March 5, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (C-4), X0-84-05247

This report concerns the situation with Daniel Cotrino and members of the Scientology organization.

Mr. Cotrino was observed by Sgt. Kronschnabl being held against his will by members of the Scientology organization. He was brought to the police department for interviewing purposes. At the police department, he complained of being lied to regarding various course requirements and attendant fees.

Cotrino did not want to press charges, he just wanted to go back to New York, his home.

Mr. Cotrino later recanted his testimony and the events of March 5, 1984.

March 6, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 RS-1

This report is an accounting of meetings and conversations with Congressnen and U.S. Senators reference the investigation of the Scientology organization. The meetings took place in Washington, D.C. with Mayor Kathy Kelly, Lt. Emmons, Congressman Bilirakis and Congressman Molinaro. Mayor Kelly, Lt. Emmons, and the staff of Congressman, Bill Young. Lt. Emmons and Kathy Kelly and the staff of Senator Paula Hawkins and Lawton Chiles.

Congressman Molinaro and Congressman Bilirakis asked me to do a report on "What is Scientology". This report is to encompass the policies and practices of the Scientology organization.

March 7, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R (S-4)

This report concerns a Elom Silberman and his children.

Mr. Silberman was a staff member working in the kitchen at the Ft. Harrison. Mr. Silberman became disillusioned with Scientology and decided to leave for Brazil. Mr. Silberman came to the Clearwater Police Department and contacted Lt. White for assistance. Lt. Mhite provided aid and assistance to Mr. Silberman and his family.

June 1, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R C-3

This report concerns Lt. Emmons' trip to Boston and Toronto reference the Scientology investigation.

In Boston, I, (Lt. Emmons), conferred with attorneys of Michael Flynn's office. I, (Lt. Emmons), received several documents concerning Scientology practices. We also talked about Mr. Flynn's pending civil cases and the dates when these cases are supposed to come to trial.

June 3, 1984, Report Number SR3.1 R 0-7

In Toronto, I, (Lt. Emmons), conferred with officials of the Ontario Provincial Police namely Inspector Orrnsby, Sgt. Campini, and Const. Bruce Burley.

I, (Lt. Emnons), looked over many documents, copied some of them, and conducted various conversations concerning the scope of the investigation/prosecution of Scientology.

In all the conversations with the above-named police officials, they assured me the scope of their investigation included placing fraud charges against many top members of the Scientology organization including L. Ron Hubbard and his wife, Mary Sue Hubbard.

I, (Lt. Emmons), was introduced to accountant, Joe Zier, when the Canadians came to Clearwater to debrief Laurel Sullivan in Feb., 1984. I met with Mr. Zier again while I was in Toronto. Mr. Zier explained the financial network as best as he could without going into documents and procedures that the court had not decided were privileged or confidential.

Mr. Zier explained the purpose of his firm's (Lundquist and Holmes) participation in the investigation was to prove a fraudulent inurement to L. Ron Hubbard and other top Scientology management personnel. Mr. Zier felt this connection of fraudulent inurement and financial transactions could be proven.

I, (Lt. Emmons), explained to the police officials the purpose of my visit was to gather enough information of fraudulent practices and other crimes committed by Scientology to present to the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement as a prosecutable package. I also told these police officials that ultimately the Scientology investigation may wind up in the Federal system. These police officials assured me many of the practices of Scientology are fraud~lent in nature and their intent was to arrest and prosecute those responsible for the frauds. They further assured me they would cooperate in any fashion so I may gather the proper information together for my presentations. I, (Lt. Emmons), was told by the Canadian police officials and Mr. Zier, the Flag Headquarters in Clearwater, Fla. is one of the most important focal points of the fraudulent inurement issue. The information gathered so far by Mr. Zier and police officials would be of importance to me or anyone examining Scientology and its practices. Flag Headquarters generates as much fraudulent income as all of the other Scientology orgs and missions combined.

Top Scientology officials would include charges of fraud and conspiracies.

In December, I, (Lt. Emmons), was informed the Chief Prosecutor for the Ontario Provincial Police, S. Casey Hill, was charged with contempt of court by lawyers representing the Scientology organization in Toronto. This contempt of court charge stemmed from Mr. Hill supposedly giving documents to the lawyer representing the Ontario Public Health and Welfare Department. These documents are sealed by court order by the presiding judge hearing the motions concerning the search warrant executed by the O.P.P. in March 1983. Mr. Hill contested the contempt of court charges and won his case. As an aftermath of these contempt of court proceedings, Mr. Hill civilly sued various lawyers representing the Scientolocry organization. In addition to suing the lawyers for damages, Mr. Hill also sued various Scientology management personnel in Toronto. This suit action against Scientology and its aoents by Mr. Hill effectively removed him from the Scientology case, something the Scientologists wanted to do, by citing Mr. Hill for contempt of court. As a result of this action, Mr. Hill's removal as Chief Counsel from the Scientology case, new lawyers were assigned to the case by the Crown Attorney.

The new Assistant Crown Attorney in charge of the Scientology case, Douglas Hill, took a new tack concerning the criminal charges against the Scientology agents and its members.

Since about 1977 and up through 1983, the Scientology organization has had covert agents in various branches of Ontario government and law enforcement. The Toronto Guardian Office also committed various burglaries including a burglary to a law firm representing Nan McLean, a litigate against Scientology. The new prosecution team of the Ontario Crown Attorneys Office elected to go with local charges against local Toronto members of the Scientology organization. In addition to placing local charges against local members, the prosecution staff elected to charge the local Scientology org with the same crimes they charged the individual members.

I, (Lt. Emmons), inquired why the posture of the Ontario Crown Attorneys Office had changed from charging top Scientology management with fraud and conspiracy to just local charges against local Canadians for "breach of trust", theft, and burglaries. I, (Lt. Emmons), also asked Ontario Provincial Police officials why a conspiracy did not exist if the Scientology organization in Toronto was charged with the same crimes as the individual members. Under Canadian law, Chapter 423, Martins Criminal Code, it appeared a violation of that section entitled conspiracies had occurred. The Ontario police officials, namely Inspector Ormsby and Det. Sgt. Campini, could not explain the actions of the Ontario Crown Assistant Attorney in charge of the case, Douglas Hunt. They could only state Mr. Hunt told them they did not have a victim as far as fraudulent practices were concerned.

Mr. Hunt also did not want to be tied up in extradiction proceedings for long periods of time.

Dec. 17, 1984

I again talked to Inspector Ormsby concerning the fraudulent practices and fraud charges against top Scientology persons. I told Inspector Ormsby after reviewing Martins Criminal Code, Chapter 338, entitled Fraud, I, (Lt. Emmons), that the Ontario Crown Assistant did not need a specific victim of a fraud as the Statute is worded as follows:

"Fraud - affecting public market. 338.(1) Everyone who, by deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretense within the meaning of this act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money, or valuable security"

The second part of this Statute concerns case law. One of the most important case laws cited is RE: London and Glode Finance Corp., LTD (1903), Ch. 728 at pp. 723-3:

"To defraud is to deprive by deceit: It is by deceit to induce a man to act to his injury. More tersely put, that to deceive is by falsehood to induce a state of mind";

Inspector Ormsby told me the information concerning the Fraud Statute was relayed to Assistant Crown Attorney Hunt without results.

January 1985

I, (Lt. Emmons), learned through independent sources, Joe Zier of the accounting firm of Lunquist and Holmes, had completed a financial analysis report on the Scientology organization. This report was the culminiation of Mr. Zier's and associates contractual obligation to the Ontario Provincial Police.

I, (Lt. Emmons), placed a phone call to Mr. Zier inquiring about Mr. Zier's availability for testimony in the United States.

My primary concern was to have Mr. Zier accompany me and other officials to a meeting with representatives of the U.S. Attorneys Office. Although Mr. Zier was personally willing to come to Florida, he felt he couldn't because of his firm's contractual responsibility to the Ontario Crown Attorneys Office and the Ontario Provincial Police. I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted Inspector Ormsby concerning Joe Zier's availability to testify and the availability of Mr. Zier's account analysis report. Inspector Ormsby did not know about the availability of Mr. Zier's report, but he would check with the Crown Attorneys.

Inspector Ormsby recontacted me, (Lt. Emmons), on the 17th of Jan., 1985. Mr. Ormsby told me he had checked with the Crown Attorneys, name unknown, and I could get the analysis report of Mr. Zier's provided a lawyer came to Canada and entered a motion in the Canadian Courts for the document. Inspector Ormsby told me this document was part of the information that was being decided by the Ontario court on the search warrant motion.

Mr. Joe Zier recontacted me on the 17th of Jan., 1985. Zier told me he could not testify or be of help in our meetings with the U.S. Attorneys Office as according to his superiors, his testimony would be a conflict of interest with the contractual duties of his firm and the Ontario Crown Attorneys Office.

On the 18th of Jan., 1985, I was contacted by Inspector Ormsby of the O.P.P. Inspector Ormsby told me the best procedure to file the proper motion for the attainment of Mr. Zier's document would be to contact Assistant Crown Attorney Douglas Hunt for help in composing the proper court paperwork.

I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted Mr. Bustin, City Attorney, City of Clearwater and explained my dilemma. I asked Mr. Bustin if he would call Mr. Hunt and ascertain the proper procedures and paperwork in filing the court paperwork to obtain Mr. Zier's financial report.

On the 22nd of Jan., 1985, at 5:00 p.m., City Attorney, Thomas Bustin, contacted Crown Attorney, Douglas Hunt. Mr. Hunt told Mr. Bustin he did not need to file a motion in the Canadian Court for Mr. Zier's report. The report in question was the property of the Ontario Provincial Police. Mr. Hunt advised Mr. Bustin to have the respective polie agencies iron out the details on how to transfer the document in question.

On the 23rd of Jan., 1985, I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted Inspector Ormsby and relayed the conversation between Mr. Bustin and Mr. Hunt reference Joe Zier's accounts analysis report. Inspector Ormsby asked that I direct a letter to his superior, Superintendent J.E. Szaraka, formally requesting the accounting report in question. The letter was composed and sent out the same day.

On the 24th of Jan., 1985, I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted Assistant Crown Attorney S. Casey Hill regarding the Scientology investigation and attendant charges made by his office and the Ontario Provincial Police.

I, (Lt. Emmons), asked Mr. Hill why their office did not charge high-ranking Scientologists with fraud or conspiracy charges as I was lead to believe would happen. Mr. Hill told me Toronto had a small Class IV org in Scientology while in the United States, and the Scientology organization had many very large Scientology orgs located in various cities.

Mr. Hill states he and his office attempted to gain cooperation with many U.S. Federal Government agencies without results.

I, (Lt. Emmons), told Mr. Hill, throughout the investigation of Scientology, I was assured fraudulent charges would be placed against various top Scientologists.

Mr. Hill told me victims in the frauds are necessary to place fraud charges.

I told Mr. Hill the fraud statutes of Ontario specifically designate either persons or the public could be defrauded. Therefore, the Province of Ontario could act in the public's interest. I further told him I knew of at least six Canadian citizens who are ex-Scientologists who began their career in Scientology through the Toronto org. All of these ex-Scientologists could testify to being defrauded. In addition to this type of testimony, every Scientologist who has ever claimed fraud can be subpoened to testify. It is the contention of all the investigators who have ever worked on the Scientoloav case, the practice of Scientology is universal. If policies and practices of Scientology indicate fraud in the United States, the same policies and practices apply in Canada. Therefore, any witness can be brought forward to testify about fraud, no matter where the fraud occurred. The Ontario Crown Attorneys Office is protecting the public's interest and not necessarily the interest of one or two individual complaintants.

Mr. Hill told me the fraud matter has not been totally resolved. Many of the documents seized by the Ontario Police in March 1983, were sealed by the courts. In the next couple of weeks, the courts will decide whether these documents should be unsealed. It is at that time the fraud issue may be decided for sure.

It should be noted: Throughout the many phone calls and days of negotiations with the Ontario Provincial Police, General Counsel, Rodney Caddy of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, was involved. The Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement's role will be explained in another report.

The following report is an accounting of various meetings and conversations with representatives of the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement.

From the beginning of my, (Lt. Emmons), assignment to the Scientology project, I have maintained contact with various F.D.L.E. agents and supervisors.

The most notable contact for any extended period of time has been with F.D.L.E. Agent, Steve VanGura. Agent VanGura and I worked together, almost on a daily basis, from March through Oct. 1983. These day-to-day contacts involved an exchange of information and exchanges of ideas. When I, (Lt. Emmons), was reassigned back to Clearwater Police Dept. Headquarters, Agent VanGura maintained a contact relationship that still exists.

On the 6th of March, 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), along with Mayor Kathy Kelly, traveled to Washington, D.C., and conferred with congressional representatives. Refer to Report SR3.1 M (W-l) These consultations resulted in the beginning construction of a report explaining the Scientology organization. With the beginning construction of this report, an overall plan of procedure was developed.

Lt. Emmons and Chief Klein conferred on how to proceed in the presentation of the Scientology case to the appropriate agencies, i.e., the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, the United States Justice Dept., and the U.S. Attorneys in Tampa. It was decided to complete the report on the general overall view of the organization called Scientology for the U.S. congressmen. Refer to Report SR3.1 R (S-17). It was also decided to compile a report for the Florida Dept, of Law Enforcement regarding an integrated statewide approach to combat organized crime. Refer to Report SR3.1 R (F-7). With regards to the F.D.L.E. report, meetings were conceived to go up the ladder and finally present our case to the Director of F.D.L.E., Robert Dempsey. The initial step of these meetings was to meet with a ~owerlevel supervisor and begin the process.

Aug. 1, 1984.

A meeting was set up with F.D.L.E. Agent Supervisor, Richard Look. I explained the Scientology organization to Mr. Look and explained the possible criminal violations. I told Mr. Look I intended to complete the statewide integrated approach paper for formal presentation.

Aug. 7, 1984.

A meeting was conducted with Agent Look of F.D.L.E. and Attorney Rodney Gaddy of F.D.L.E. At this meeting, I explained the Scientology organization and attendant criminal violations. Mr. Caddy had grave reservations about prosecuting the Scientology organization due to the religious problem presented by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. I explained several cases, (cites), involving Scientology. In these cases, the government did not pursue the religious status of Scientology. The questionable secular activities were attacked by government, not the so-called religious practices. In all the I.R.S. tax cases, the government contended many secular practices of Scientology are fraudulent in nature. For the purposes of government interests, the I.R.S. lawyers contended the Scientology organization evaded paying taxes on profit-making ventures. I gave Mr.Gaddy an extensive list of case cites involving Scientology.

Aug 10, 1984.

On this date, Mr. Caddy met with this writer, (Lt. Emmons), Mr. Bustin, the City Attorney, and Special Counsel for the City of Clearwater.

At this meeting, Mr. Bustin and Mr. Blakely explained how Mr. Gaddy may circumvent the religious issue problem. Mr. Bustin explained to Mr. Gaddy how the City of Clearwater prepared their case of Charitable Solicitations and still avoid the pitfalls of religious issues. Mr. Gaddy asked for the completed interagency cooperation report so he may study the alleged violations of Florida State Statutes.

Sept. 1, 1984.

I met with Attorney Gaddy and gave him the completed interagency report. Mr. Gaddy told me, (Lt. Emmons), he would need some time to digest the report and he would get back to me. Mr. Gaddy agreed to set up a meeting with his superiors when he has reviewed the interagency report.

Sept. 13, 1984.

On this date, Chief Klein and I traveled to Tampa for a meeting with F.D.L.E. representatives regarding Scientology.

We first met with Atty. Caddy before the general meeting with Mr. Caddy's superiors. Mr. Gaddy explained the reservations about prosecuting Scientology, i.e., the religious status problem. The ability of the jury understanding the practices and policies of Scientology, and the ability to portray the fraudulent inurement of L. Ron Hubbard.

I, (Lt. Emmons), once again explained he practice of Dianetics, the Purification Rundown, and the E-meter and their connection to secular fraudulent practices. I, (Lt. Emmons), also explained how the inurement to L. Ron Hubbard works. Mr, Caddy equated these practices to ramblings of a science-fiction writer. I explained to Mr. Caddy how Hubbard depicts himself as a nuclear scientist and medical doctor to sell his courses to the Scientology public.

Hubbard has made positive assertions of medical cures based on his so-called medical research.

In the general meeting, Mr. Caddy expressed the same prosecution concerns as he had previously expressed in our preliminary meeting. I, (Lt. Emmons), once again explained the fraud connection with Scientology courses and the interconnection to inurement - L. Ron Hubbard.

The group agreed the Scientology investigation belonged to the Federal authorities because of witness subpoena problems. Mr. Gaddy agreed to help the City of Clearwater in case presentation to the Federal authorities.

On the 15th of Sept., 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), traveled to Tampa and rediscussed the Scientology issue with Mr. Caddy, I went down through the interagency report with Mr. Caddy explaining each section in detail.

Mr. Caddy finally agreed fraudulent activity does exist in Dianetics and other Scientology practices. Mr. Caddy also agreed L. Ron Hubbard is receiving monies based on fraud.

Mr. Caddy wanted to assist the Clearwater Police Dept. in case preparation and presentation to the Federal authorities.

It should be noted, immediately after this meeting, Mr. Caddy was going to assume his new position and general counsel for the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement. Mr. Caddy would be relocated in Tallahassee. Mr. Caddy would still maintain the Scientology case.

On the 10th of November, I, (Lt. Emmons), met with Attorney Caddy at the Clearwater Police Dept. Mr. Caddy told me he was working on the case preparation and wanted to have the meeting with the Federal authorities before the holidays. I showed Mr. Caddy the report, The Organization Called Scientology, that could be used as part of the case presentation. I, (Lt. Emmons), told Mr. Caddy I would prefer to wait until the Canadian authorities had effected their arrests on various Scientology officials. These arrests would make a laraer impact on our case presentation. Mr. Caddy agreed on this proposition.

On Dec. 10, 1984, the Ontario Provincial Police and the Ontario Crown Attorneys Office "laid" charges against several local (Toronto) Scientologists. The charges "laid" were not of the scope it was supposed, i.e., fraud and conspiracies against some Scientology top management. Refer to Report Number SR3.1 R (0-7).

This action or rather lack of action caused Mr. Caddy and I, (Lt. Emmons), to re-evaluate our case presentation efforts. It was decided to wait and present our case to the Federal authorities after I, (Lt. Emmons), had received accountant, Joe Zier's, report on the financial analysis of the Scientology organization and the attendant fraudulent practices. Negotiations were begun to receive this report.

Mr. Caddy agreed to contact the Ontario Provincial Attorney handling the Scientology prosecution and find out how the financial report by Mr. Zier could be obtained by Lt. Emmons.

City Attorney, Thomas Bustin, eventually contacted Crown Attorney Hunt inquiring how to obtain Mr. Zier's financial report.

(Both Mr. Bustin and Lt. Emmons were under the impression the financial report would have to be obtained through court motions in the Ontario Courts)

Mr. Hunt advised Mr. Bustin to contact the Ontario Provincial Police to obtain Mr. Zier's report. Mr. Hunt stated the report is the property of the Ontario Provincial Police with the Ontario Crown Attorneys Office acting in an advisory capacity only.

I, (Lt. Emmons), contacted the Ontario Provincial Police, Inspector Ormsby, regarding the financial report. I was instructed to write a letter to Superintendent Szaraka, Anti-Rackets Division, asking for the financial report.

I, (Lt. Emmons), then contacted Rodney Caddy, Attorney for the Florida Depart. of Law Enforcement, and advised him of our progress. Mr. Caddy informed me he was still working on a case presentation for the Federal authorities and would keep me posted on his progress.

On the 15th of August, 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), met with I.R.S. Criminal Investigator, Al Ristuccia. Mr. Ristuccia flew in from Los Angeles to interview this writer concerning the policies and practices of the Scientology organization.

I, (Lt. Emmons), outlined the practices of Scientology as it relates to fraudulent inurement and fraudulent inducements. I, (Lt. Emmons), explained the Scientology organization and corporate structures to the best of abilities. The day-long meeting was very fruitful for both agencies.

I, (Lt. Emmons), had some documents and material copied for use by the I.R.S.

On August 20, 1984, I sent Agent Ristuccia more documents and information concerning the Scientology organization.

On June 4, 1984, I, (Lt. Emmons), received contact from Atty. John Toothman of the Federal Civil Programs in Washington, D.C. in regards to Scientology documents.

Mr. Toothman explained his role, to defend government agents and agencies from civil suits. His primary assignment at the present time is to defend the Government from Scientology suits.

Mr. Toothman asked for various documents pertaining to previous harassing litigation instituted by the Scientology organization.

Mr. Toothman also asked for other documents pertaining to the Scientology practices of attacking the attacker, Fair Game, and Level O Checklist.

I, Lt. Emmons, provided these documents to Mr. Toothman.

Mr. Toothman asked for a general overview of Scientology and its practices. I, (Lt. Emmons), explained to Mr. Toothman I was working on the report, The Organization Called Scientology, refer to Report Nuinber SR3.1 R(S-17), and he could look this report over when it became complete. Mr. Toothman asked if the report would have an index so he may review it for any information or documents he might want. I, (Lt. Emmons), told Mr. Toothman I would send him a copy of the report index when the report was completed.

Dec. 1, 1984. I sent Mr. Toothman a copy of the completed index to the report, The Organization Called Scientology.

Dec. 5, 1984. I, (Lt. Emmons), was contacted by Mr. Toothman and he requested a copy of the entire report, The Organization Called Scientology. Mr. Toothman arranged to have a private company contracting for the Government come to Florida and copy the aforementioned report.

On the 9th, 10th, and 11th of Dec., the report was recopied for Attorney Toothman.

From June 4, 1984 until the present, many contacts and exchanges of information have been made between Attorney Toothman and myself.